She spoke to this masthead about the connection she had made in her speech between her personal illness and how a Voice could have helped her and other Australians in a similar situation.
“If our services in health were more able to also be culturally responsive and more accessible … that in the service design that actually makes it possible for me to understand my condition and what I needed to do. I might not be here, and I think there’s lots of people in that situation.
Loading
“And I think there’s a lot of people that need to appreciate that all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been consistently under-serviced and misunderstood. And that is perpetuating the ongoing disadvantage. And we don’t have to have that. It doesn’t have to be like that. We have a choice to change that,” she said.
“This is a simple modest change that has the potential to deliver so much that’s positive and the other thing I think people forget is when Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have delivered and designed services to meet our needs, they’ve ended up being models that serve all Australians better as well. And so we’re not just talking about doing things differently for a small margin of society. We’re talking about doing things better in general.”
The 50-year-old has been a South Australian state recipient of the Australian of the Year award and held leadership roles in sport, culture, social justice and public policy. She was the first Indigenous person to be appointed to the AFL executive.
Tanya Hosch is congratulated by South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas after her speech. Credit: Sarah Reed
Hosch said in her speech the Yes campaign’s volunteer army was making strides across Australia convincing voters to back the referendum.
The Voice, she argued, would give Indigenous Australians a newfound stake in the nation.
“We have been left without a durable or genuine say in how the matters that affect us are to be managed,” she said.
Loading
“This is all the No case offers. It leaves things as they are and that is just not acceptable. We can close gaps and make better policies by giving communities a voice, by doing something simple, by listening to the voices of communities who know the problems they face and the solutions they need.”
“There is a lot of noise about the scope of the Voice and some of it is genuine, but some of it is sheer mischief and we say to the mischief-makers that we cannot sit back while decisions that affect us are made without our input and without our expertise.”
“We are not interested in being on the periphery of daily life anymore. We want to change life-altering policies that have made hardships seem insurmountable.”
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.
