“You’ve slowed down and started turning things around, so that is to your credit… I do take some heart from the fact that he’ll be living in Katanning, so he’ll be a long way from [the complainant’s location],” Rafferty told the court.

Loading

The WA government previously proclaimed electronic monitoring of family and domestic violence “thugs” would be mandatory when the act was brought in last December.

“Courts will now be compelled to impose electronic monitoring on repeat and high-risk family violence perpetrators who are on bail or otherwise supervised in the community,” WA Premier Roger Cook said in a statement last year.

“The legislation makes it mandatory.”

However, the government walked back that ironclad commitment less than a year after its introduction, saying in response to questions that the decision to electronically monitor a repeat offender is one for a judge or magistrate.

“It’s the courts’ responsibility to assess whether someone should be released on bail,” a state government spokesperson said.

“If the courts decide bail is suitable, electronic monitoring is one of many tools that can be used to monitor serial FDV offenders.”

The state is likely to fall short of its self-imposed target of 550 offenders being tracked in the first year of the new laws – in their first 10 months, 409 “thugs” had been monitored.

The laws’ effectiveness in regional areas have dogged the state government since their introduction last December.

“I’m not going to do it, because if they can’t do electronic monitoring in Bunbury, then they’re not going to be able to do electronic monitoring in Katanning.”

In the bail amendment hearing in Perth’s District Court last week, Radomiljac was allowed to move from regional WA to the state’s capital for work. While he must now report to police daily, electronic monitoring was still not imposed.

Prosecutors opposed him residing in Perth, fearing it would give him greater access to his alleged victim, and he would be better monitored in the small country town “effectively in the middle of nowhere” where he was originally bailed.

Radomiljac was approached outside District Court last week but declined to comment.

Chief executive of Women’s Legal Service WA Jennie Gray said there was no point requiring a tracking device if the resources weren’t available, as it may give victim-survivors a false sense of security.

“Perpetrators who present a known risk should not be released without these safeguards in place,” she said.

Libby Mettam, the opposition’s spokeswoman for the prevention of family and domestic violence, said it was clear courts were not obliged to impose tracking, despite what the government said.

“This is an extraordinary backdown by the Cook Labor government on the mandatory monitoring of violent repeat offenders,” Mettam said.

“This represents a complete failure to keep women safe.”

Melissa Callanan, chief executive of Waratah, a sexual assault centre for women in regional WA, was damning of the court’s approach.

“Sexual violence is being reported at record high levels, yet remains among the most challenging crimes to prosecute,” she said.

“Victims routinely describe the legal process as retraumatising, with many saying the experience of navigating the justice system was worse than the assault itself.”

Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.